Archive October, 2008




Diversity, founded on social engineering “is about creating a operational culture that seeks, respects and values dissimilarity” without regard to how diversity increases productive and unity of effort.

Skills and experience– as industries move from physical to a more managerial professions so does the need for more skilled graduates. If the market is “tight” (it means not enough staff for the jobs), employers will have to fight for employees by offering financial rewards, community investment and so on.



Alarmists and advocates of social engineering theory quote a “rise in discrimination, unfair dismissal, sexual and racial harassment cases” as an indicator of the necessity for more diversity legislation. While such measures have a important effect on the organization, they influence little or no real transform in advancing diversity of ideas in the workplace. Anti-discrimination laws and regulations do need businesses to undertake a cost-benefit analysis. The consequence of this analysis is often to adopt an approach that normally recognizes gender, racial, and sexual orientation diversity as a cheaper option to fighting endless litigation.



Over recent years companies have had to become more diverse in their employment practices in order to cope with the lower work ethic of the new generations. The service industry for instance, has embraced those “baby-boomers” desiring to reenter the workforce. Traditional advocates of “workplace diversity” easily advocate an employee base that is a mirror reflection of the make-up of society insofar such as race, gender, sexual orientation, and so on. These advocates concentrate on the social engineering theory with no understanding the more significant points: diversity of ideas to stop stagnation of products and business development; expanding the customer base through “outreach”; and income.


To know the business environment where any organization operates, three chief trends should be considered:Demographics – the characteristics of a population and workforce, for instance, age, gender or social class. This type of trend may have influence in relation to pension offerings, insurance packages etc.Diversity – the difference within the population and workplace. Changes in society now mean that a bigger proportion of organizations are made up of “baby-boomers” or older employees to compare to thirty years ago.